Wani hukuncin da wata Kotun Majistire da ke Gwammaja a Kano ta yanke ya sake janyo hankali kan yadda hukumomi ke yaƙi da ta’ammali da kayan maye da wasu laifukan da ke da alaƙa da shi.
Abin da ya faru
A cewar rahoton, wani kwamitin kar-ta-kwana da ke yaƙi da ta’ammali da miyagun ƙwayoyi a Kano, ƙarƙashin jagorancin Muhyi Magaji Rimin Gado, ya kama Jabiru Umar Sanda Zage a ɗakinsa, inda aka ce an samu kwalaben kodin 151, tare da wasu mata uku da ake zargin suna cikin maye.
An gurfanar da wanda ake zargin a gaban Kotun Majistire mai lamba 44 da ke Gwammaja, ƙarƙashin Mai Shari’a Muhammad Alhaji Isa.
Me kotun ta yanke?
Rahoton ya ce kotun ta yanke masa:
- Shekara ɗaya a gidan yari saboda laifin da ya shafi kayan maye.
- Wata shekara ɗaya saboda laifin ajiye mata a ɗakinsa.
Wannan ya kai shekaru biyu gaba ɗaya. Sai dai rahoton bai bayyana a fili ko kotun ta umarci a yi waɗannan hukunci a lokaci guda (concurrently) ko kuma ɗaya bayan ɗaya (consecutively) ba. Wannan bambanci yana da muhimmanci wajen sanin ainihin tsawon lokacin da wanda aka yanke wa hukuncin zai iya shafe a gidan yari.
Muhimmin abin lura kan zarge-zargen
An kuma ce an gurfanar da Jabiru Umar Sanda Zage kan wasu zarge-zarge da suka haɗa da shiga ƙungiyar masu aikata laifuka, ta’ammali da kayan maye, bai wa mata da masu aikata laifuka mafaka, da kuma damun kotu.
Amma daga bayanan da aka bayar, hukuncin da aka tabbatar a wannan rahoto ya shafi laifukan kayan maye da kuma ajiye mata a ɗakinsa. Don haka bai kamata a ɗauki sauran zarge-zargen a matsayin waɗanda kotu ta tabbatar da su ba sai an samu cikakken bayanin hukuncin.
Me wannan ke nufi ga yaƙi da miyagun ƙwayoyi?
Lamarin ya nuna cewa yaƙi da kayan maye ba ya tsaya kan kama masu safarar miyagun ƙwayoyi kawai. Wurin da ake amfani da su ko kuma inda ake ajiye su na iya shiga cikin binciken hukumomi idan akwai isasshen dalili da hujjoji.
Haka kuma, samun adadi mai yawa na kwalaben wani abu da ake zargi kayan maye ne na iya zama muhimmin ɓangare na shari'a, amma a tsarin shari'a, abin da ake zargi da shi da kuma abin da kotu ta tabbatar da shi hujjoji ne ke bambanta su.
Tambayar da ta rage
Babbar tambayar da rahoton bai amsa ba ita ce: Shin shekaru biyun za a haɗa su ne lokaci guda, ko kuma a bi su ɗaya bayan ɗaya?
Wannan batu na iya sauya fahimtar ainihin tsawon zaman gidan yarin, don haka cikakken kwafin hukuncin kotun zai taimaka wajen tabbatar da shi.
A takaice: Rahoton ya nuna wani mataki mai ƙarfi daga hukumomin Kano wajen dakile ta’ammali da kayan maye, yayin da kotu ta yanke wa wanda aka gurfanar jimillar hukuncin shekara biyu kan laifukan da rahoton ya ce an tabbatar da su. Amma sauran zarge-zargen bai kamata a ɗauke su a matsayin tabbatattu ba ba tare da cikakken hukuncin kotu ba.
0 Comments